Emotional Intelligence in Data Form
Position Paper - Introducing TEG-Code
🔷 Quick Overview
TEG-Code turns emotional behaviors—like guilt-tripping, gaslighting, or taking accountability—into structured, machine-readable data.
It helps systems and humans tell the difference between:
- Survival vs. manipulation
- Repair vs. performance
- Connection vs. control
🔷 The Problem We’re Solving
Most tools treat emotions like simple labels:
happy, sad, angry.
But emotional behavior lives in intent, regulation state, and impact.
That’s why:
- Gaslighting often goes unnoticed.
- Emotional repair is mistaken for being “nice.”
- Survivors doubt themselves for years.
We need tools that track emotional safety and harm with real structure.
🔷 What TEG-Code Offers
Each behavior is translated into:
- Color Zone (green, orange, red)
- Relational Intent (connect, protect, punish, control)
- Pattern Type (repair cue, survival response, control tactic)
- Relational Impact (builds trust, erodes safety)
- Example Text (how it actually sounds or feels)
This isn’t “positive vs. negative”— It’s a gradient of intent and regulation.
🔷 How It Works
Each card is stored in JSON-LD, a web-friendly format.
That means it can be:
- Parsed by machines
- Queried by researchers
- Expanded by therapists, coders, and survivors
Under the code is a trauma-aware emotional logic, built for systems that want to protect people—not control them.
Q&A5 Common Myths About Emotional Data
Most systems treat emotion as either too messy to model—or too simple to need depth. These myths don’t just limit technology—they distort how we see human behavior. When emotional data is misunderstood, harm gets mislabeled as harmless, empathy gets misread as weakness, and real pain gets lost in translation. TEG-Code challenges these blind spots by offering a framework that sees emotion as structured, contextual, and essential—not soft, chaotic, or optional.
A quick breakdown of how most systems misunderstand emotion—and what TEG-Code offers instead.
❌ The Myth | ⚠️ Why It’s Harmful | ✅ TEG-Code’s Response |
Emotions can be fully quantified | Reduces rich emotional states to numbers or scores—ignoring story, intent, and relational meaning. | Maps emotion as logic, not just data. Emotions are patterns, not metrics. |
One universal model fits all | Erases cultural, neurodivergent, and trauma-based differences in emotional expression. | Builds flexibility into the model. Emotion = context × history × intent. |
Emotional data is objective | Hides bias in labeling, power in framing, and context in meaning. | Makes emotional logic transparent. Shows behavior, impact, and motive—side by side. |
Emotion is the opposite of logic | Devalues emotional reasoning, especially in survival or relational stress. | Frames emotion as structured logic. Defense and belonging are emotional algorithms. |
Emotion models are only for therapy or AI | Excludes emotional awareness from systems that need it—like education, justice, or leadership. | Designs for systems, not silos. Emotional safety is a foundation for all human systems. |
🔷 Sample Card (🔴 Gaslighting)
Intent: Control
Impact: Distorts reality
Example:
“You’re being way too sensitive. That’s not how it happened at all.”
🧠 Code version:
{
"@context": {
"eb": "https://emotionalblueprint.org/schema#",
"rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#",
"xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
},
"@graph": [
{
"@id": "eb:Card_003",
"@type": "eb:Card",
"rdfs:label": "Gaslighting",
"rdfs:comment": "A manipulation tactic that makes someone question their perception of reality, memory, or emotions, in order to maintain power or avoid accountability.",
"eb:colorZone": "red",
"eb:intent": "control",
"eb:patternType": "control tactic",
"eb:exampleText": "You’re being way too sensitive. That’s not how it happened at all.",
"eb:relationalImpact": "distorts reality",
"eb:cardGroup": "Empathy Collapse"
}
]
}
🔷 Why It Matters
Emotional harm is subtle—It hides in timing, tone, and intent disguised as care.
TEG-Code gives language to what usually goes unnamed.
This helps us track:
- What real emotional safety vs. control feels like
- How passive-aggressive “help” erodes trust
- What actual repair looks and sounds like
It’s not just for AI.
It’s for therapy, design, education, parenting—any system holding humans.
🔷 How to Collaborate
We’re looking for people who understand emotional depth—not just technically, but relationally.
You can help by:
- Suggesting new patterns to add as Cards
- Tagging real-world harm that TEG-Code could help prevent
- Stress-testing the logic (as a therapist, survivor, or builder)
We’re especially open to:
- Neurodivergent coders + researchers
- Trauma-informed therapists
- AI safety teams
- Storytellers + emotional designers
If something in you says this matters—we want to hear from you.
🔷 Downloads + Links
📥 Download PDF Version of This Page ↓
🌱 Learn more at emotionalblueprint.org
The Emotional Gradient Blueprint (TEG-Blue™) © 2025 by Anna Paretas
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
This is a living document. Please cite responsibly.
🌐 emotionalblueprint.org ┃ 📩 annaparetas@emotionalblueprint.org